How much
description should go into a historical romance? Usually I start like this:
OK, I have my great premise
Then I focus on a time and a place for this story
NO, no,
no.
Let's re-think that.
In historical fiction, the setting should be essential and the first thing I
think about.
If readers feel my story could have happened anywhere, at any
time, then I’ve failed at the very first hurdle. The historical setting must come first. I need a story
that could have taken place nowhere but the one place where it did happen.
Once we have a time and place sorted, how to describe it?
So instead, I should drip-feed descriptions of the setting
into my story.
I should keep descriptions short and powerful and use every sense I have. We smell and hear places as
well as see them. Some places have an atmosphere
and sometimes it is peaceful and sometimes it is threatening.
I should not forget to describe the social and cultural morals
of the time. Gin Lane without the gin would just be inaccurate.
Use metaphors
and similes where Ican but I must make them original. Clichés are not what I want. If there
is movement in the scene, that is better than a an unmoving one. If I can remember all this when I'm writing, then I should be well on the way to achieving my aim!
No comments:
Post a Comment