Spotted this article today and saved it here so I can pop back and re-read at my leisure. It may be that other writers missed it, too! and I'm sure they will be interested. It seems author Jane Holland has a blog called 52 ways to write a novel (which I did not know but will now follow) and back in March this year an argument about indie/self publishing sprang up there.
http://52waystowrite.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/on-self-publishing-bad-advice-and-being.html
Something I noted this morning - the Historical Novel Society has redefined the way it reviews books. Evidently there are to be no distinctions between traditionally published and self published, but in order to climb out from beneath the piles of submissions, the criteria for earning a review are to be tighter, higher or just more rigorous, depending which word you prefer. I saw this on Facebook this morning, and now - typically - I cannot find the piece! I believe it was Alison Morton who placed the article, which may make it easier to find, but if not then I'm sorry Alison.
Ten minutes later, again in typical Facebook fashion, I fell across Alison's post and hastily copied the link. Here it is:
https://historicalnovelsociety.org/our-reviews/indie-reviews/
.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment