Showing posts with label film. Show all posts
Showing posts with label film. Show all posts

Wednesday, 29 January 2014

Cinema Conventions

The cold has turned into a hacking cough which nobody would love, but I'm actually starting to feel better. Unhappily, dh seems to be going the other way.....

Last night I watched The Devil Wears Prada again, and enjoyed it. Sometimes you just want stuff that's little more than moving pictures - elegant pictures, pictures with humour, a pithy message or two but no great angst that will burden the dreams for years to come. The Devil fitted the bill. I think Emily Blunt does a great part as Emily, Streep is glacial and vicious without seeming to be bitchy, and Hathaway is something of a mismatch - clever ingenue, if that's the right phrase, so that when she decides to join the Runway girls, she has the brains to do the job. Not that Emily hasn't; for her it's love of fashion, whereas for Hathaway it's a challenge. Funny but I can't remember her character's name.....

I started to watch a Dustin Hoffman movie about a bug getting loose somewhere, and gave up before I was far in for fear my eardrums/brain would give up the unequal struggle.  Why does a certain type of US film have characters that shout at full speed on telephones or in corridors when a lot of the wiseass cracks (sorry, that is probably not a good phrase - it certainly isn't elegant) mean less than nothing? It's as bad as the constant thumps of deep base noise - almost ultrasound - to alert film audiences to the fact that something a) frightening, b) scary or c) plain ordinary is happening or about to happen on screen. The noise shocks even if the happening on the screen does not.

Other film conventions that irk - hero/heroine dashes across 4 lane highway, Starbucks and parcels flying and holds hand, palm out, to stop cars while she skids across. Try that here and you're likely to get squished. Then there's the hero/heroine who barges at full speed  through a conversational couple or group on the pavement, peacefully minding their own business, and no one turns a hair! A whole heap of abuse would follow you here. In the old days it used to be the cowboy who galloped his horse for miles and miles and miles - even days - across the Great Desert. Now it's the car chase where no one ever runs out of petrol at a crucial moment.....
Clearly I'm still not back to normal. Unless anyone out there has spotted a few film conventions to complain about? Go on, I'm sure you have!

Monday, 6 January 2014

Outlander

As a long time reader of Diana Gabaldon's Claire and Jamie adventures, I have to admit to a slight disappointment re the casting. Jamie was a redhead, and Claire had amber-gold colouring. Couldn't they have used a few packets of hair dye so the description matched the characters in the books? Also, she was some years older than Jamie. I forget how many exactly, but I did look it up once and it was a considerable gap. The actor is 33, the actress who plays Claire, 34.

I would never have described it as a science-fiction-fantasy story, which is how it is being advertised. To me it is historical through and through, though technically it is a time-slip novel. But it will be interesting to watch if only to see if they twist the story as much as they twisted the history in the Tudors. I'll be tearing my hair out if they do. Here are some links to whet the appetite of any Outlander fan:

http://www.scotsman.com/lifestyle/arts/news/outlander-tv-show-will-secure-scots-film-future-1-3166093

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2507425/Sci-fi-fantasy-series-Outlander-begins-filming-Scotland-Super-8s.html

https://www.facebook.com/OutlanderTVSeries.starz


Much of the articles consist of  Scottish politicians/business people reacting to the news, but there are some nuggets to be had. The series will be of 16 episodes and will show in the US in 2014. (If it is peppered with adverts, then I suppose that will reduce it to a series of 12 episodes!)

It began filming in September 2013, with locations like Douane, Falkirk and Duns Castles.  To my knowledge, woefully inadequate about today's film world, there isn't a single "big-name" star to carry the series. I suppose they're banking on the success of the novels - 20 million sold and counting, with a new one almost ready to hit the streets. (Unless it already did? Note to self - check!)